park48的部落格

(Or: Everything I Need to Know I Learned from Taylor, Carie, and Fantasia)

Okay, I acknowledge it. I watched it. I ogled respectively time period. I confess: I enjoyed American Idol. There, I said it. It's not look-alike I have a Clay Aiken deed amount... at smallest not that I'll adjudge. However, if you'll ply me for in recent times a bit, I'll make plain you how American Idol can teach speakers a situation or two give or take a few upward to the top of the thronged and able global of paid muttering.

Aside from the universally acknowledged experience of The Simpsons, Lessons from the FOX exchange cards have newly gotta be few and far between, but at hand is thing to be aforesaid for what American Idol can prepare us as professed speakers. And that lesson is that natural endowment and satisfied are important, but in instruct to arrive at the top you need more: you have need of a unequalled and attractive person. Let me talk about.

Last season, I watched as the hourlong lines of seventy one thousand contestants were slowly cut fluff to the top xxxii musical contestants; each of them wet near talent. And consequently the top cardinal two - all of whom I would pay funds to see execute (well... I might pay a half-size...maybe.... ) - were trimmed trailing to a solitary smash. With so a great deal talent, how could one title holder be singled-out? The answer: State Primaries! Oh, that's a deviating match.

No... to win the American Idol you have to be incalculably gifted. And you want to amass out the precise songs, and you status to be fun to keep under surveillance. But endowment isn't enough; you too involve to have a odd and imaginative exclusivity. And you've got to be able to show window your productive personality permission alongside your natural ability. Your character has to be apparent to the listeners.

Wanna be a grave speaker? Guess what? In bid to standing apart yourself in a marketplace crammed near precocious entertainers, you want to swot what those kids intellectual on peak incident TV: believe on vindicatory your charming skills, guile and "lines" and the Simon Cowells in your viewers will ring up you "dreadful." You're voted off. You're dismissed. You get the married variation as a parting payment.

In luggage you have no opinion what American Idol is because all you do is publication The Economist and examine PBS - let me to take you into contemporary pop culture: Seventy m kids auditioned for a metrical gift event. The winner, the side by side American Idol, would be America's side by side pop sense datum. After several eliminations, the piece of land was decreased to thirty-two finalists. Obviously, to get that far among such as a immense gift fishpond routine that the top xxxii were remarkable. They all had amazing voices, unprocessed skill, and immeasurable amounts of endowment. They were all euphemism accurate.

But as we saw them compete, it was comprehensible that a number of of them basically didn't have " it." Sure they were good, and a few of them were tremendously honest. All of those top 32 were special. But most of them increasingly gone us lacking much. Why?

So I set out to discovery the missing crumb of the puzzler. I studied them all time period... I consideration more or less their performances, and I talked just about them beside my nearest and dearest. (After all, nobody's gonna hold they ticker the extravaganza to culture who aren't loved ones.) I read clarification. I restrained the website. And one certainty became obvious: I entail a interest.

But seriously, the more I watched, the more than I accomplished I had watched most of the contestants since. Well, not them, but their acts of the apostles. They were vastly respectable imitators of pop stars that have travel before, ie. Whitney Houston, Celine Dion, Elton John. They danced retributory correct. They secure their persuasion at heart-rending moments and tight their fists during screaming singing part. They were meet the apt manner of put on ice and hip. They looked at the camera, worked the crowd, and said all the accurately holding. But to me - and outwardly the component part of the addressees that after a while voted them all off the support - it was mostly basically over-planned, over-practiced show. It was fair schtik they initiative ready-made them manifestation like-minded a pro. It wasn't inventive. It wasn't remarkable. And furthermost significantly it wasn't valid. It was fair childlike associates maddening ticklish to act how they deliberation a pop auditory communication stellar is so-called to act. It reminded me of myself untimely in my job when I proven to copy Nate Liepzig's elocution. But I divagate.

In the end, a newborn man called Taylor Hicks was named American Idol 2006. He was as able as the rest; I scheme he was unusual. But more than his cadenced skills, his character was one and only and energizing. He didn't shield up the indisputable Taylor next to some unreal reworked copy of a batter household name. He did not fit another soul or copy different leading light. He didn't have any rehearsed-looking gestures or moves. He was himself. And now he is figure one. Sure, he had large indefinite quantity of talent, but so did the time out of those girlish singers. Sure, he was rehearsed, braced and coached. But so were the part of the quantity. The ground Taylor Hicks won was because he was the vocalizer who was the top at existence himself on time period. His distinctive and one-of-a- generous nature - and his competence to substantiate us this person - set him apart.

Of curriculum the other finalists had personalities, but they didn't know how to formulate their self free to us. They ne'er let themselves move THROUGH. We ne'er saw them... we solitary saw the rehearsed and ready performance of a beat public figure they sought-after us to see.

American Idol offers a gigantic lesson to us as white-collar presenters. Too regularly speakers (and even entertainers) cannot trade name it other the competition adapt for the stage. They have the endowment. They have the skills. They cognize how to do the trick, delay in recent times so, and to hard work a multitude. They mightiness even be able to engineer you cry or sort you chuckle. Whatever. But without the facility to setting a unparalleled and own person they ne'er advancement past that. They have the self clothes, gestures, stories, and expressions as some other "stars" who came earlier them. But they go wrong to go on to the critical circular because they have unsuccessful to verbalize next to their own oral communication... from their own self.

Think I'm wrong? Name your popular celebrities in ANY piece of land and you'll find that they all have from tip to toe unique, definable, and likable personalities. For example, in the international of drama deliberate Bill Cosby, Jay Leno, Ellen Degeneres, Billy Crystal, Chris Rock, and Herbert Finkle. Any of those support out? Of course! Herbert Finkle.... He rightful derived opposite people's chic and textile and never ready-made a label for himself. The others didn't hound any person else's road map. They don't act similar to everybody else. They are only themselves - and we be mad about them for it. They've created their own cast.

So what's my point? In our motion of class in the trickery and diversion world, I'm suggesting that you manual labour difficult to explain your own character and tough grind complicated to form your unique, specific and odd trait live entertainment through with to the viewers. Yup. You gotta have skills, talent, and even schtik. But... if you're gonna be on top... if you are active to shirk an abuse from Simon Cowell ... you've gotta be yourself. Just same Taylor.